It was together-time galore for Lindsay Lohan and Samantha Ronson over the weekend. Let's start on Saturday, when the twosome touched off a media scrum at New York Fashion Week as they stepped out for the runway show of the DJ's designer sister, Charlotte Ronson.
The actress, 22, looking fabulous in a cleavage-ariffic, curve-clinging dress, whispered and laughed with her inamorata, 31, from the front row and happily posed for pictures with her.
And the story was much the same on Sunday night at the MTV Video Music Awards in Los Angeles, with Lindsay hitting the red carpet in a deep purple satin minidress and Barbarella-inspired tresses before sitting side by side with Sam in the audience.
(Alas, neither occasion provided a repeat of their recent caught-on-camera lip-on-lip action.
The seeming seriousness of their relationship -- from their months-long joined-at-the-hip status to their schmoopy MySpace messages -- has led one British tabloid to take the typical leap made with many a celebrity pairing, namely, by speculating on the pitter-patter of little feet.
In a report that puts the "OB" in "improbable," Britain's News of the World floats the idea that the actress, who went to rehab three times last year and is just starting to regain her personal and professional footing (no thanks to her attention-seeking, indiscreet dad), is hoping to welcome the stork with Ronson.
"Lindsay is in a very happy place at the moment. She's been having deep discussions about a baby," alleges a source, who may or may not be attempting to do some sort of stealthy promotion for Lohan's upcoming pregnancy flick, "Labor Pains." "She wants a natural birth and has spoken to Sam about getting one of her ex-boyfriends to help out. They don't want to adopt."
The words you're grasping for here: Yeah, right.
Anyhoodle, in more believable news, Lindsay may not be pulling in the big paychecks from her "Mean Girls" heyday, but that doesn't mean she's desperate enough to ditch her shirt for cold hard cash.
The New York Post says she nixed a (we think lowball) $700,000 offer from Playboy to pose for an eight-page topless spread in the January issue.
Seems the men's mag wanted Lindsay to pay homage to one of her favorite stars by having her channel Ann-Margret from the flick "Kitten With a Whip."
But her rep brushes off the report, insisting that her skin-baring Marilyn Monroe tribute in the pages of New York earlier this year was her butt-nekkid swan song.
"If there's nudity, then the answer's no," the paper quotes the mouthpiece as saying. "She's not going down the [New York] magazine road again."
No comments:
Post a Comment